A Gentleman's Murder

Image of A Gentleman's Murder (Eric Peterkin, 1)
Release Date: 
July 31, 2018
Reviewed by: 

Some titles capture the book’s contents well. This is one of them, as the whole murder mystery revolves around being an English gentleman in 1924.

The main character, Eric Peterkin, claims, “My father taught me about honor. He taught me that a gentleman does what’s right.”

But a fellow member of the Britannia Club sets him straight: “No, a gentleman does what he thinks is right. That may not be the same thing at all. He may do what’s right for the wrong reasons, or he may get his hands dirty doing wrong to achieve the right ends. It’s never so simple as any code of honour will have you believe.”

This paradox is dramatized by the murder of a gentleman at the Britannia Club in London. Each club member, a war veteran by requirement, is revealed over the pages to be a seething bundle of paradoxes and contradictions behind his gentlemanly facade.

Each member also is presented as a suspect in what first appears to be a locked-room-puzzle-type mystery. All we know for sure is who didn’t do it—Eric. Through his eyes we see the others stripped down, and through his logic and legwork the puzzle pieces are uncovered and reassembled.

Meanwhile, Eric suffers from his own internal conflicts. An English-Chinese cross who grew up in India, he’s a British citizen but treated like an outsider. He’s only in the Britannia Club because one of his ancestors founded it, and each male in the lineage has since belonged. He’s the end of the family line, and his investigations jeopardize his membership. But like the other members, he fulfills the veteran requirement, having served in the trenches of World War I. The veterans’ brotherhood forms a bond that nobody wants to break.

All of the club’s veterans exhibit symptoms of what we now call post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and survivor guilt. That’s what causes much of their contradictory behavior. In their time and place, however, the phenomenon is in the early phases of discovery and diagnosis, so PTSD traits are misunderstood, ignored, or concealed. Emotional reaction is considered weakness and masked by the classic British “stiff upper lip.” As Eric puts it: “It wasn’t in [another member] to let on that anything was amiss: if his upper lip were any stiffer, he’d need surgery to eat his dinner.”

The stiff-lipped gentlemen of the Britannia Club are nonetheless capable of great passion and heroism. The cause of the murder goes back to and even before the war, and involves women, and secrets, and shame—with more murders committed to cover up unsavory truths. All the characters’ pasts intersect at the Britannia Club, where long-simmering issues boil over.

Eric is perhaps the worst person to stick his nose into the situation. His Chinese heritage makes him a victim of the English culture’s embedded prejudice. The author handles this well, presenting the social mores through showing rather than telling. He reminds us through story that the bigotry of earlier eras hasn’t changed very much.

His own Chinese heritage, and his experience living in bicultural places like Singapore and Montreal, suggests he has personal knowledge of cultural conflict. In this, his first novel, he tosses in a zing of prophecy by having a character say, “One of these days, someone would have to write a story, perhaps even a detective story, featuring a Chinese hero.”

Well, yep—that’s exactly what the author has done. And it works because Eric is an Everyman character up against age-old antagonists. His story could be set most anywhere in most any time where a civilization has class layers and mixed ethnicities and subcultures. In A Gentleman’s Murder, we have gentlemen murdering gentleman (and ladies) in a war-exhausted England trying to rebuild itself into something new.

A common belief of the day is expressed by one of the secondary characters, a wartime nurse: “I don’t know if any war should be called the Great War. It was the war to end all wars, something so awful that no one can stomach the thought of another. We’ve paid a high price for our peace, and we’ll all work together to preserve it.”

Today’s readers who know what happened 20 years later (World War II) might shudder at the naïveté of that statement. But it sets the stage for the paradoxical elements of this novel, which shows people in transition from war to peace, both externally and internally, and how some come through crises and move forward, while others collapse under the strain.