United States

Reviewed by: 

“There is a general consensus among the contributors to Cold Rivals that the strategic competition between the US and China will continue into the

Reviewed by: 

For the last 80 years, global commerce on the oceans has been conducted in a mostly peaceful manner protected by the mantel of the United States Navy.

Reviewed by: 

The role of the news establishment and the American newspaper has undergone several profound transformations in American history.

Reviewed by: 

Maximalist is a highly readable account of American engagement during the Cold War and the War on Terror.

Reviewed by: 

Urging the imperative “to distinguish between the desirable and the vital as well as between the feasible and the impossible,” Richard Haass forcefully, cogently, and compellingly makes the case th

Reviewed by: 

“You have to admire their consistent and scientific approach; other commentators basically just wing it.”

Reviewed by: 

It has taken weeks longer than it should to get through Ann Coulter’s latest book, Mugged—and even then it was difficult to write an objective review.

Reviewed by: 

“. . . reasoned and prudent approach . . . take her warnings regarding the inherent dangers of voter suppression politics seriously.”

Reviewed by: 

“. . . a wonderful book that deserves to be read widely . . .”

Reviewed by: 

“. . . highly readable and enjoyable excursions through history . . .”

“The Almighty has His own purposes,” Abraham Lincoln memorably said.

Reviewed by: 

“A reasoned and systematic historical analysis of contemporary Islamic societies is a book still waiting to be written.”

Reviewed by: 

“We Can All Do Better is a book that every responsible citizen should read, reflect on, and consider in determining which candidate to back in the upcoming elections.”

Reviewed by: 

“Those who share Dr. Foley’s ‘admiration and respect for the movement’ will find this book invigorating.

Reviewed by: 

“There is humor and personality in every paragraph of We’re with Nobody. The writing is intelligent, detailed, and intimate.

Reviewed by: 

“Many will disagree with Michael O’Hanlon on essential points. But the level of debate is what counts so that our armed forces are supported by intelligent strategic decisions.

Reviewed by: 

“. . . stiff, awkward, and confusing with all of its redundant information. . . .

Reviewed by: 

“Could it be that what feeds both ‘dependence corruption’ and excess lobbying is simply overworked Representatives? . . .